Chicken Little
08-09-2008, 04:21 AM
MOSCOW — Russian tanks rumbled into the breakaway Georgian republic of South Ossetia on Friday, and volunteer Russian fighters reportedly made their way over the border, pushing Moscow closer to a full-blown war against U.S.-backed Georgia.
The fighting that erupted among Georgia, Russia and Ossetian rebels over the mountainous sliver of land threatened to provide a battleground for long-simmering tensions between Moscow and the West. At nightfall, each side was calling in reinforcements and pumping out its own radically unique version of the day's events.
A sharp escalation began earlier Friday, when Georgia launched a large-scale, predawn military operation meant to seize control over the rebel region, whose de facto autonomy and ties to Russia have long been an irritant to Georgian leaders. Backed by warplanes, Georgian troops plunged into South Ossetia and waged a hard battle throughout the day for control of the republic's capital, Tskhinvali.
Officials on both sides reported civilian deaths, although estimates could not be confirmed. South Ossetian officials said that some 1,400 people had been killed in the battles, and Georgia announced that 30 people had died in the Russian bombardment.
Each side blamed the other for violating a shaky cease-fire.
Source & continuation (http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/hotstories/5933338.html)
Russia and Georgia edged dangerously close to direct conflict today after Tbilisi launched an overnight offensive to regain control over the breakaway province of South Ossetia.
Fighting raged around the city of Tskhinvali, the South Ossetian capital, as Georgian troops backed by tanks and warplanes pounded separatist forces. At least 15 people were reported to have been killed.
The fighting had raised fears of an all-out war that could draw in Russia, which has peacekeepers in South Ossetia and which backs the separatists.
"There has been bombing on Georgian territory by the Russian Federation," said Mikhail Saakashvili, the Georgian President. "It is nothing but classic international aggression."
Source & continuation (http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article4483968.ece)
TBILISI, Georgia - At least 1,500 people have been killed in fighting in Georgia's embattled breakaway province of South Ossetia, Russia's foreign minister said on Saturday.
Sergey Lavrov told a conference call with foreign journalists that the death toll was continuing to rise.
Meanwhile, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said Russian troops must protect civilians in South Ossetia and force Georgia into a cease fire. Many people in the province hold Russian passports.
He described the situation in as a "humanitarian catastrophe"
Georgia launched an offensive to regain control over South Ossetia. Russia responded by sending in armed convoys.
Georgia accuses Russia of bombing its towns, ports and air bases and has asked the international community to help end what it called Russian aggression. Source & continuation (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26080747/)
So what do we think about all sides of the supposed conflict here? Is Russia right in effectively defending their countrymen who happen to be in the area or promoting the succession? Georgia right in attempting to stop the succession by military force? What about the US' role as a backer of Georgia or their aspirations for NATO membership? The UN Security council and the larger possible conflict or political importance?
The fighting that erupted among Georgia, Russia and Ossetian rebels over the mountainous sliver of land threatened to provide a battleground for long-simmering tensions between Moscow and the West. At nightfall, each side was calling in reinforcements and pumping out its own radically unique version of the day's events.
A sharp escalation began earlier Friday, when Georgia launched a large-scale, predawn military operation meant to seize control over the rebel region, whose de facto autonomy and ties to Russia have long been an irritant to Georgian leaders. Backed by warplanes, Georgian troops plunged into South Ossetia and waged a hard battle throughout the day for control of the republic's capital, Tskhinvali.
Officials on both sides reported civilian deaths, although estimates could not be confirmed. South Ossetian officials said that some 1,400 people had been killed in the battles, and Georgia announced that 30 people had died in the Russian bombardment.
Each side blamed the other for violating a shaky cease-fire.
Source & continuation (http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/hotstories/5933338.html)
Russia and Georgia edged dangerously close to direct conflict today after Tbilisi launched an overnight offensive to regain control over the breakaway province of South Ossetia.
Fighting raged around the city of Tskhinvali, the South Ossetian capital, as Georgian troops backed by tanks and warplanes pounded separatist forces. At least 15 people were reported to have been killed.
The fighting had raised fears of an all-out war that could draw in Russia, which has peacekeepers in South Ossetia and which backs the separatists.
"There has been bombing on Georgian territory by the Russian Federation," said Mikhail Saakashvili, the Georgian President. "It is nothing but classic international aggression."
Source & continuation (http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article4483968.ece)
TBILISI, Georgia - At least 1,500 people have been killed in fighting in Georgia's embattled breakaway province of South Ossetia, Russia's foreign minister said on Saturday.
Sergey Lavrov told a conference call with foreign journalists that the death toll was continuing to rise.
Meanwhile, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said Russian troops must protect civilians in South Ossetia and force Georgia into a cease fire. Many people in the province hold Russian passports.
He described the situation in as a "humanitarian catastrophe"
Georgia launched an offensive to regain control over South Ossetia. Russia responded by sending in armed convoys.
Georgia accuses Russia of bombing its towns, ports and air bases and has asked the international community to help end what it called Russian aggression. Source & continuation (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26080747/)
So what do we think about all sides of the supposed conflict here? Is Russia right in effectively defending their countrymen who happen to be in the area or promoting the succession? Georgia right in attempting to stop the succession by military force? What about the US' role as a backer of Georgia or their aspirations for NATO membership? The UN Security council and the larger possible conflict or political importance?