PDA

View Full Version : Which WMD would YOU choose to end humanity?


Lancet Jades
07-28-2004, 12:30 PM
Choose, foolish mortals :D

I'm going with nuclear. Best mass-destructive capabilities ^_^

Zelphiel
07-28-2004, 01:13 PM
gotta go with the superlaser on the moon.... just like weapon B :paranoid

Setzophone
07-28-2004, 03:17 PM
I have to agree, Superlaser on the moon sounds like a quicker death...

Dark Marmosett
07-28-2004, 03:31 PM
Oh....but you forgot tractor beam accompied by a giant asteriod or in other words "Preperation H". -_-

Spartan God
07-28-2004, 03:32 PM
I like the gaint super laser on the moon idea, never herd of so i'm going to go with it.

sephiroth4eva
07-28-2004, 03:53 PM
lol.. i would go with nucular.... as long as i got hit with it... if u just die from nucular fall out, that would blow.... but meh... if ur gona die.... ur gona die... ya know?

Laggy
07-28-2004, 05:25 PM
not sure, all would suck but i think that Chemical could be kinda a fast death (up to the Chemicals though, i guess lol)

Leknaat
07-28-2004, 06:41 PM
Laser on the Moon...I laughed when I read it.:D

Dark Marmosett
07-28-2004, 06:45 PM
Yeah that was from Austin Powers The Spy Who Shagged Me but what about "The Tractor Beam Preperation H" from Austin Powers Goldmember. That would be a very destructive weapons of mass destruction and blowing stuff up of the ness.

Zelphiel
07-28-2004, 08:17 PM
Laser on the Moon...I laughed when I read it.:D


me too. and at least if you survived, and ran across an alien race you could tell them how your civilization ended... and a superlazer on the moon just sounds cooler than the others. :chuckle

Lancet Jades
07-28-2004, 09:47 PM
me too. and at least if you survived, and ran across an alien race you could tell them how your civilization ended... and a superlazer on the moon just sounds cooler than the others. :chuckle

Yeah, but all you laser people, consider this:

For decades, supervillians have been buying propety on the moon to build their lasers. Not only is pretty much all the prime real estate already bought, but the remaining stuff's prices have skyrocketed. It would cost almost $500 billion more to build the laser nowadays than just 10 years ago.

Laggy
07-28-2004, 10:00 PM
would would you think cousts the least?

i'd say that out of all listed Chemical would be the more cheap one, but im not sure

Wallie Wildo
07-28-2004, 10:12 PM
nuclear bye bye people ^_^

sephiroth4eva
07-28-2004, 10:43 PM
u are right... b/c chemical warefare can agents can be found anywhere.. like anthrax on farms..... and ricin in extraced castro beans.... u would just have to make lots of chemical warefare factories... and nuclear plants costs millions.... and the lazer on the moon.. yea.... billions.. lol.... but i still say nuclear

Lancet Jades
07-28-2004, 10:58 PM
nuclear bye bye people ^_^

Bye bye cacaw ^_^

and

Bye bye kitty ^_^

sephiroth4eva
07-28-2004, 11:42 PM
lol... and bye bye cheese..... cant forget that....

Zelphiel
07-28-2004, 11:49 PM
Yeah, but all you laser people, consider this:

For decades, supervillians have been buying propety on the moon to build their lasers. Not only is pretty much all the prime real estate already bought, but the remaining stuff's prices have skyrocketed. It would cost almost $500 billion more to build the laser nowadays than just 10 years ago.


so? you can't put a price on total world domination :D

Lancet Jades
07-28-2004, 11:50 PM
so? you can't put a price on total world domination :D

No, but you can put a price on the means to do it :D:D

Zelphiel
07-29-2004, 01:20 AM
oh well... I can always dream. :rolleyes

Blake
07-29-2004, 01:47 AM
biological..they dont even know what's happening!

Wallie Wildo
07-29-2004, 01:49 AM
but you want them to know and suffer and be scared well at least i do ^_^

Lancet Jades
07-29-2004, 03:08 AM
Nuclear can do that :D

Ricdeau
07-29-2004, 08:34 AM
Chemical and Biological, because they Fuck people up before killing them, and make them suffer in mutation etc.. Yeah, I'm sick..

Lancet Jades
07-29-2004, 08:47 AM
Chemical and Biological, because they Fuck people up before killing them, and make them suffer in mutation etc.. Yeah, I'm sick..
Yeah, but out of the two of those, i'd use chemical. :D

Zelphiel
07-29-2004, 12:33 PM
Chemical and Biological, because they Fuck people up before killing them, and make them suffer in mutation etc.. Yeah, I'm sick..

true, but like I said before... it sounds better to say that some mad scientist built a super lazer on the moon and killed half the planet with it.

Lancet Jades
07-29-2004, 12:36 PM
true, but like I said before... it sounds better to say that some mad scientist built a super lazer on the moon and killed half the planet with it.
Meh, but its been done before.

Zelphiel
07-29-2004, 01:01 PM
um... which world are you living in. I can't seem to remember that ever happening...

idgaf rpgfan
07-29-2004, 01:04 PM
I like the super laser. It's that whole Death Star thing!

Lancet Jades
07-29-2004, 01:20 PM
*sigh* No one appreciates a good nuclear winter anymore :(

Zelphiel
07-29-2004, 02:18 PM
ok then... what if it's a nuclear winter lazer. :hmm

Kaffee
07-29-2004, 03:29 PM
I would have to say chemical, that a way i don't destroy the cities in which i want to rule, just get rid of the pesky Humans. :)

Dark Marmosett
07-29-2004, 04:19 PM
But smashing a huge asteriod into the earth would cause nuclear winter. and it happend with the laser....only in Austin Powers though.

Bubb
07-29-2004, 04:59 PM
Hmmmmmmm i'd rather have something with Napalm in it...... like a sandwich....... mmmmmmmm napalm sandwich.... but i guess i'll have to settle with the Nuke... ooh ooh could it be a nuke with napalm?!?! :D not that i ahve a fascination with fire or anything

Spartan God
07-29-2004, 05:11 PM
yeah, the idea of a nuke is more sensible

Dark Marmosett
07-29-2004, 07:17 PM
Did someone say I should burn something? I like fire and burning things. But its more sensible me destroying the world buy my burning it to ashes.

Laggy
07-29-2004, 07:32 PM
Chemical & Biological
...

...

at the same time :D

Ricdeau
07-30-2004, 10:50 AM
Nukes are boring. Everyone has seen things explode on movies and stuff, but I don't think many people have seen people get turned inside-out and have holes burnt through their heads :P

Lancet Jades
07-30-2004, 11:07 AM
Nukes are boring. Everyone has seen things explode on movies and stuff, but I don't think many people have seen people get turned inside-out and have holes burnt through their heads :P
Yeah, but nothing spreads hellfire and death like nukes. Use one, and the effects are still being felt hundreds of years later :D:D:D

Dark Marmosett
07-30-2004, 11:33 AM
Yeah but but burning is better becuase it makes a nice cloud of carbon dioxide that kills everything. Also did someone say I should burn my grass.....*stops pouring gasoline on grass and lights match and throws it onto the grass* Oh well if no one did I guess that grass went to waste like all the other things I burnt :D j/k

Zelphiel
07-30-2004, 03:51 PM
Nukes are boring. Everyone has seen things explode on movies and stuff, but I don't think many people have seen people get turned inside-out and have holes burnt through their heads :P


and my new and improved moon lazer can do that. it's all yours for 500 simple, easy paments of $95,498,307.32. :D


btw... think of this. you destroy the world with nukes, from your comfortable resort lounge on the moon, and pick off any remaining military resistance with your super moon lazer. :hmm

Bubb
07-30-2004, 04:00 PM
ok, put me down for two moon lasers......... :D

sephiroth4eva
07-30-2004, 04:36 PM
lol.... its not plural... it just says superlazer.... that would cost a lot tho.... i guess if u we re going to go out, u might as well go out with a .... blast from a lazer that came from outer space....

Zelphiel
07-30-2004, 04:41 PM
I'd probably have my main death ray on the moon, but I'd also have dozens of sattelite lazers orbiting earth so I can strike down anyone at any time.

Ricdeau
07-30-2004, 04:45 PM
I think this is going to your head Lathypoo. You cant ACTUALLY have one, you know. It's kinda like a what if. And here *hands you $1,000,000,000,000,000* That should just about cover it, no?

Bubb
07-30-2004, 04:49 PM
Could it be plural if their were two moons??? coz if it could then i would use my nuke to shatter the moon into two pieces (precision aiming) and then set up 2 moonlasers..... nwhahahaha

Lancet Jades
07-30-2004, 10:35 PM
and my new and improved moon lazer can do that. it's all yours for 500 simple, easy paments of $95,498,307.32. :D


btw... think of this. you destroy the world with nukes, from your comfortable resort lounge on the moon, and pick off any remaining military resistance with your super moon lazer. :hmm
Yeah, but you have to choose: Nukes or Superlaser. You cant have both :P

Laggy
07-30-2004, 10:38 PM
with a lot of money he can :P

Lancet Jades
07-30-2004, 10:47 PM
Suurree.....

I meant the question itself says you can choose only one. Thus, regardless of finances, only one can be used :D

Laggy
07-30-2004, 10:50 PM
:laggy <(_|_)>


well..still..IRL..if you had alot of money you could do all of em :P

sephiroth4eva
07-30-2004, 11:31 PM
true... but if u had all that money... u could blow up the planet.... plus live in space till u died.... u could have the most sophisicated space ship in the ... universe? taht man knows of.... and stay alive with all that money.....

Zelphiel
07-31-2004, 01:40 AM
Yeah, but you have to choose: Nukes or Superlaser. You cant have both :P


not if we team up...

you wouldn't want to cover the world with nukes... because you wouldn't have much of a world to rule after that. You can nuke all the major cities and military bases, and I'll take out all the remaining resistance....


and yes Demmy... I know it isn't an actual thing.........yet...

Dark Marmosett
08-02-2004, 08:12 AM
Ypu mean a sattelite system of stragetic lasers, like Ronald Regeans "star wars" plan.

Lancet Jades
08-02-2004, 10:03 AM
not if we team up...

you wouldn't want to cover the world with nukes... because you wouldn't have much of a world to rule after that. You can nuke all the major cities and military bases, and I'll take out all the remaining resistance....


and yes Demmy... I know it isn't an actual thing.........yet...

But lathan, the question isnt "which would you use to rule the world", its "Which would you use to END the world"...

Kiros
08-02-2004, 10:20 AM
im goin with superlaser on moon lol

HIM
08-02-2004, 11:16 AM
mine would be chemical... its sometimes slow to kill, but before you even realize, its wiped out an entire population....before they can do anything about it

Gravity
08-03-2004, 08:44 AM
Nukies, I guess.. Do some of you have experience? :D

Dark Marmosett
08-04-2004, 08:08 PM
I guess chemicals since no one will put tractor beam becuase if chemicals get onto stuff it can burn nicely. What that little leprachaun....I should burn everything....Ok.

nightsavior
10-12-2004, 02:57 AM
a swarm of carnivorous highly intelligent insects OR demons emerging from cracks in the earth left by quakes. sorry had to be the demented one. lol.

Lancet Jades
10-12-2004, 01:43 PM
When it comes to this subject, we're ALL demented!

Dark Luther
10-13-2004, 11:05 PM
Biological, because it's the most likely to work.
Chemical weapons are very inefficient to use as a killing weapon:
you would need between .3 to 10 tons of sarin per square mile in order to get a lethal dose for an unprotected person. With modern protection ( masks/suits ), this multiplies.

Nukes won't work as well either, you would need to have intervals between blasts and that would give the little bastards time to take cover. The reason for the intervals is the interval blast theory, in which the first nuke in an area will hit at full blast, but one nearby within a few minutes would be reduced by one third, the next would be a between 6th to 13th the strength ( numbers vary between schools of thought ). This was why the US built concentrated concrete silos instead of several launch sites scattered.

A good, developed disease could be released and not show first signs until weeks after it's introduction into society. By this time the entire population will have been infected, presuming you have introduced it in enough areas. The first that will die will be the extreme young and elderly, so it will appear as a form of flu ( we have a shortage of the vaccine so no surprise ). Now everyone is gone, plus you haven't blown up their stuff.

Mr Bad Man
11-18-2004, 01:20 AM
I say superlaser from the moon because sounds so cool and it would be something I would d-*hides plans of earths destruction*

Briar Rose
11-18-2004, 08:16 AM
I'd definately choose a virus that only I was made imune to... something that is normal but create a super strain. That'd make the lines at disney world shorter. LOL

:P

Dark Marmosett
11-18-2004, 11:22 AM
Actually....put me down for 10 of those superlasers as well.....theres been an annoying bright light in the sky that I've been meaning to destroy for a long time.

:D :sweatdrop

Dark Luther
12-28-2004, 02:23 PM
Interesting.
The problem with lasers is that we can't fix the problem of debree or gas. When a laser hits something like a tank the heat causes a gas of metal that acts like a shield against the laser.

Still, if you get a good enough laser from the moon and hit the north pole - that little cloud could easily turn to your advantage as it causes a green house effect, while the laser melts the north pole and causes a shift in world temperature and sinks the coasts under water - while flooding 60% of the worlds fresh water with sea water.

Lancet Jades
12-28-2004, 02:51 PM
Interesting.
The problem with lasers is that we can't fix the problem of debree or gas. When a laser hits something like a tank the heat causes a gas of metal that acts like a shield against the laser.

Still, if you get a good enough laser from the moon and hit the north pole - that little cloud could easily turn to your advantage as it causes a green house effect, while the laser melts the north pole and causes a shift in world temperature and sinks the coasts under water - while flooding 60% of the worlds fresh water with sea water.
When we say superlaser...I mean something powerful enough to shatter the earth, not some piddly little orbital laser...

Setzophone
12-28-2004, 03:06 PM
someone takes these things too literally >.>

Dark Luther
12-28-2004, 09:37 PM
You mean your not planning for real too?

Lancet Jades
12-28-2004, 10:05 PM
You mean your not planning for real too?
I never said that, but when someone says "superlaser on the moon" you should think one shot = blown up earth

<.<
>.>
<.<;;;

Dark Luther
12-29-2004, 01:46 AM
No, I was stating it in reference to the belief I was taking this to litterally.
Which is propostarous, as I would never go so crazy as to put a laser on the moon, not while I have my army or rocket armed penguins poised to march down the street.

What's worse is that they are Jackass Penguins ( an actual species from South America ), this means that because they are endangered the military will not be able to shoot at them - hell the government may even be forced to fund me.

The end....

Mr Bad Man
01-04-2005, 11:00 PM
Why don't you just threaten everybody on Earth that if they didnt do what you say you would blow up the Earth.

Or rub out the world with a giant eraser

Or get a time machine and change History

king kuppy
01-22-2005, 12:39 PM
i would go with chemical weapons or (if it was a choice)like a huge virus like SARS or something like that

Seraph Zero
02-06-2005, 03:04 PM
Tough choice...
Nukes are fun to watch, but I'm partial to the Death Star superlaser finish. Heh, yes, I'm a Star Wars fanatic....